-
Josh Korda
Recent items
-
Christian Kohl
Recent items
-
Erric Solomon
Recent items
-
Tahlia Newland
Recent items
-
Marc Jacquemin
Recent items
-
Marieke van Vugt
Recent items
-
Brandt Passalacqua
Recent items
-
Guy Allenby
Recent items
-
Elizabeth Namgyel
Recent items
-
Charles T.Tart
Recent items
-
Sandra Pawula
Recent items
-
Ian Gawler
Recent items
-
Jerome Stone
Recent items
-
Andy Fraser
Recent items
-
Ian Ives
Recent items
-
Kirsten DeLeo
Recent items
-
Steve Cope
Recent items
-
Fiona Clarke
Recent items
-
Susan Stiffelman
Recent items
-
Bernie Schreck
Recent items
-
Med in school
Recent items
-
Christian Meier
Recent items
-
Kimberly Poppe
Recent items
-
Erika Rosenberg
Recent items
-
Linda Lantieri & Madhavi Nambiar
Recent items
-
John Baker
Recent items
-
Miles Neale
Recent items
-
Mark Standlee
Recent items
-
Zanna Yardas
Recent items
-
S in the City
Recent items
-
Jeremy Tattersall
Recent items
-
Marcia Binder-Schmidt
Recent items
-
Sharon Salzberg
Recent items
-
Eva Hopf
Recent items
-
Volker Dencks
Recent items


- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (7)
- March 2013 (8)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (14)
- August 2012 (7)
- July 2012 (8)
- June 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (13)
- April 2012 (12)
- March 2012 (15)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (16)
- December 2011 (13)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (11)
- August 2011 (15)
- July 2011 (19)
- June 2011 (19)
- May 2011 (17)
- April 2011 (25)
- March 2011 (16)
- February 2011 (15)
- Written by Marieke van Vugt
- // Wednesday, 18 April 2012 01:35
Dealing with strong emotions in a complex world
Last week for me was a whirl-wind of emotions. I was getting ready for a conference, and at the same time had to deal with a co-author on a paper who kept wanting to change things (which involved me doing a lot more work in time that I simply did not have). In short, it was a great chance to work with my emotions. And today was the travel day to the conference, with the lovely surprise that someone decided to jump in front of the train, such that all trains were out of commission and I had to find another route to Berlin. Yet, surprisingly, after not dealing with the previous issues very elegantly, this last little bit of train delays did not disturb me majorly. At every road block (e.g., a bus driver driving very slowly although all passengers had a connection to catch on the other end) somehow there was a voice in me that said something about that all these feelings and emotions were just that: thoughts and emotions (and not atom bombs!).
This leads me into the discussion of a nice scientific article I've been wanting to blog about for a while now: "Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators". While a lot of scientific research has focused on the effects meditation has on attention and cognition, I feel like probably a much more important effect of meditation is that on emotional reactivity. Luckily, this study addresses that. The authors induced emotions in their participants by having them look at a set of pictures designed to arouse emotions. These pictures include some very horrific war scenes, but also wonderful pictures of cuddly animals etc. The scientists wanted to contrast emotional reactions to these pictures, and at the same time studied neural activity of these participants during their reactions. This neural activity could then be used to say something about how people regulated their emotional responses. The scientists predicted that this mechanism of emotion regulation would differ between novices and experienced meditators. If course one should exercise extreme caution inferring cognitive processes from brain activity (an activity termed "reverse inference"), but at least it can lead to hypotheses to be tested in follow-up experiments.
The scientists found that when in meditation, their participants showed a less intense emotional reaction, at least according to their self-report. What was interesting then was comparing their brains in a meditative versus a baseline state. The scientists found that beginning meditators had a lot of activation in brain areas typically associated with emotions and emotion regulation, such as the amygdala and the right insula. Experienced meditators almost did not show any particular brain activation that changed between the meditative and neutral states. However, the experienced meditators exhibited a consistently lower activation in the posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex, areas that have typically been associated with mind-wandering. The scientists interpreted this as follows: beginning meditators still have to actively suppress some emotions and need a lot of activation of emotion-regulation areas for this. For experienced meditators, reduced emotional intensity during the meditative state is simply a result of a decrease in mind-wandering.
So what does this mean? Although a lot of research still has to be done, I feel this comprises some scientific evidence for a role of meditation practice in emotion regulation. Actually, a recent paper used a very interesting approach to arrive at similar conclusions. They showed that in participants whose self-regulation was improved by a mindfulness-based smoking cessation intervention, their heart-rate variability increased in the meditative state. Increased heart-rate variability has also been found to be an indicator of self-regulation. So maybe my meditation practice was the factor that helped me in the past week deal with a nagging co-author and with delayed trains...
Add comment
It is necessary to supply an answer in all the fields.

Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post